This person is actually breaking their contract. They knew in the interview they were required to attend the meetings, which isn't exactly onerous. And is anybody really going to complain if you take off at 4 or take a longer lunch. This person is trying to take advantage of situations of gross employee abuse, when it doesn't apply. For USD $100,000 you can't come one hour early four times a YEAR, when you known about it ahead of time? All this says to me is immaturity and not ready for promotion.
This person is actually breaking their contract. They knew in the interview they were required to attend the meetings, which isn't exactly onerous. And is anybody really going to complain if you take off at 4 or take a longer lunch. This person is trying to take advantage of situations of gross employee abuse, when it doesn't apply. For USD $100,000 you can't come one hour early four times a YEAR, when you known about it ahead of time? All this says to me is immaturity and not ready for promotion.